<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HDSLR: Cheap Compact Flash vs. UDMA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mxr.at/hdslr-cheap-compact-flash-vs-udma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mxr.at/hdslr-cheap-compact-flash-vs-udma/</link>
	<description>unprocessed dumps of various kind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:10:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christoph Tilley</title>
		<link>http://blog.mxr.at/hdslr-cheap-compact-flash-vs-udma/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph Tilley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mxr.at/?p=173#comment-258</guid>
		<description>As far as I can tell there was no difference in image quality between the cards. Wether in noise, rolling shutter, bitrate, color or anti-aliasing. But different test may produce different results. I recently had to buy a new CF card and I chose the Sandisk UDMA 32GB because the occasionally occuring caching issue (which forces the camera to stop recording) was quite annoying. With the new firmware for the 5D which bumped the bitrate too 44Mbit/s this issue is even more a concerne.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I can tell there was no difference in image quality between the cards. Wether in noise, rolling shutter, bitrate, color or anti-aliasing. But different test may produce different results. I recently had to buy a new CF card and I chose the Sandisk UDMA 32GB because the occasionally occuring caching issue (which forces the camera to stop recording) was quite annoying. With the new firmware for the 5D which bumped the bitrate too 44Mbit/s this issue is even more a concerne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.mxr.at/hdslr-cheap-compact-flash-vs-udma/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mxr.at/?p=173#comment-257</guid>
		<description>I was just debating whether or not to get a UDMA card... I currently have SanDisk Ultra IIs (15mb/s, non-UDMA), and was thinking of going with 32gigs worth of the el cheapo kingstons or 16gb of Extreme III 30mb/s (which are similar price... kind of.)

Do you know, by chance, if there was less noise with the UMDA card (I can&#039;t tell from the small jpegs).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just debating whether or not to get a UDMA card&#8230; I currently have SanDisk Ultra IIs (15mb/s, non-UDMA), and was thinking of going with 32gigs worth of the el cheapo kingstons or 16gb of Extreme III 30mb/s (which are similar price&#8230; kind of.)</p>
<p>Do you know, by chance, if there was less noise with the UMDA card (I can&#8217;t tell from the small jpegs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
